TAC 2008 Tracks
Call for Participation
TAC 2008 Workshop
TAC 2008 Question Answering Track Guidelines
II. Test data
III. Submission guidelines
The goal of the TAC QA track is to foster research on systems that search large document collections and retrieve precise answers to questions (rather than entire documents). The focus is on systems that can function in unrestricted domains.
The 2008 QA task focuses on finding answers to opinion questions. The 2008 QA task is similar to the main QA task in TREC 2007 in that the test set will consist of question series. However, each series in 2008 asks for people's opinions about a particular target (rather than general information about the target), and the questions will be asked over only blog documents. There will be two types of questions -- rigid list questions and squishy list questions -- each with its own evaluation measure. The rigid list questions will be evaluated using the same methodology used to evaluate list questions in past TREC QA Track tasks. The squishy list questions will be evaluated with the nugget Pyramid method used to evaluate complex questions as described in (Dang and Lin, 2007).
The test questions for the QA task will be available on the TAC 2008 QA home page on June 24. Submissions are due at NIST on or before July 1, 2008. Each team may submit up to three runs (submission files) for the QA task, ranked by priority. NIST will judge the first- and second-priority runs from each team and (if resources allow) up to one additional run from each team. The first-priority run must be fully automatic; second- and third-priority runs are allowed to be manual.
II. Test Data
The test set consists of 50 targets, each with a series of 2-4 questions about that target. Each series is an abstraction of a user session with a QA system. Each series will contain a number of rigid list questions and a number of squishy list questions.
The question set will be in the XML format given in the following:
The questions used in previous TREC QA tracks are in the Data/QA section of the TREC web site. This section of the web site contains a variety of other data from previous TREC QA tracks that may be useful for system development. This data includes judgment files, answer patterns, top ranked document lists, and sentence files.
Answers for all questions in the test set must be drawn from the TREC Blog06 collection. The TREC Blog06 collection is a large sample of the blogsphere, and contains spam as well as possibly non-blogs, e.g. RSS feeds from news broadcasters. It was crawled over an eleven-week period from December 6, 2005 until February 21, 2006. The collection is 148GB in size, consisting of:
For the TAC QA task, each instance of an answer must be supported by a document from the permalinks component of the Blog06 collection. (See the section on Assessment environment for technical details about assessment involving blog documents.) There are over 3.2 million permalink documents in the Blog06 collection. Each document in the permalinks collection is the raw HTML content from the Web wrapped between a <DOC>...</DOC> pair. Just after <DOC>, there are some informational metadata tags, including the <DOCNO> element which contains the document ID. More details can be found in the Blog06 README.
The TREC Blog06 collection was created by the University of Glasgow for the TREC 2006 Blog Track. The collection is currently distributed only by the University of Glasgow. License details and information on how to obtain access to the TREC Blog06 collection are provided in http://ir.dcs.gla.ac.uk/test_collections/. Further information on the Blog06 collection and how it was created can be found in the DCS Technical Report TR-2006-224, Department of Computing Science, University of Glasgow at http://www.dcs.gla.ac.uk/~craigm/publications/macdonald06creating.pdf.
As a service to the track, for each target, NIST will provide
the ranking of the top 1000 documents retrieved by the PRISE search
engine when using the target as the query. NIST will not provide document
lists for individual questions.
Note that this is a service only, provided
as a convenience for teams that do not wish to implement their own
document retrieval system. There is no guarantee that these rankings
will contain all or even any of the documents that actually answer the questions in a
series. The document lists will be in
the same format as previous years of TREC QA:
NIST will also provide the full text of the top 50 documents per target (as given from the above rankings). Participants who would like to receive the text of the top 50 documents must submit or have already submitted to NIST a signed user agreement form for the Blog06 collection. The user agreement form for Blog06 is located at http://tac.nist.gov/data/forms/org_appl_blog06.html. Participating teams that have already obtained the Blog06 collection from the University of Glasgow should fax to NIST their existing (signed) Blog06 organization agreement. Please submit all forms to NIST following the instructions at http://tac.nist.gov/data/forms/index.html.
III. Submission guidelines
A submission file for the QA task must be a plain text file containing at least one line for each question in the QA task. Each line in the file must have the form:
Any amount of white space may be used to separate columns, as long as there is some white space between columns and every column is present. The answer-string cannot contain any line breaks, but should be immediately followed by exactly one line break. Other white space is allowed in answer-string. The total length of all answer-strings for each question cannot exceed 7000 non-white-space characters. The run-tag should be the concatenation of the Team ID and the priority of the run. (For example, if the Team ID is "NISTAssessor" then the run-tag for the first-priority run should be "NISTAssessor1".)
Each team may submit up to three runs, ranked by priority (1-3). The first-priority run must be a completely automatic run. NIST will evaluate the first- and second-priority runs from each team. If resources allow, NIST will evaluate the third-priority run from each team.
NIST will post the questions on the TAC QA web site on June 24 and results will have to be submitted to NIST by 11:59 p.m. (EDT) on July 1, 2008. Results are submitted to NIST using an automatic submission procedure. Details about the submission procedure will be emailed to the firstname.lastname@example.org mailing list when the test data is released. At that time, NIST will release a routine that checks for common errors in submission files including such things as invalid document numbers, wrong formats, missing data, etc. Participants should check their runs with this script before submitting them to NIST because the automatic submission procedure will reject the submission if the script detects any errors.Restrictions
For automatic runs, no changes can be made to any component of the QA system or any resource used by the system in response to the test targets and questions. If there is any manual processing of questions, answers or any other part of a system or the resources that it uses, then the resulting run must be classified as a manual run. At the time of submission, each team will be asked to fill out a form stating:
Targets must be processed independently (i.e., the system may not adapt to targets that have already been processed). Questions within a series must be processed in order, without looking ahead. That is, the system may use the information in the questions and system-produced answers of earlier questions in a series to answer later questions in the series, but the system may not look at a later question in the series before answering the current question. This requirement models (some of) the type of processing a system would require to process a dialog with the user.
For each rigid list question, the system should return an unordered, non-empty set of [answer-string, docid] pairs, where each pair is called an instance. The answer-string must contain nothing other than an answer item, and the docid must be the ID of a permalink document in the Blog06 collection that supports answer-string as an answer item. The answer-string does not have to appear literally in a document in order for the document to support it as being a correct answer item.
An answer-string must contain a complete,
exact answer item and nothing else. Support, correctness, and exactness
will be in the opinion of the assessor.
Instances will be judged by human assessors who will assign one
of four possible judgments to an instance:
Note that this means that if an answer-string contains multiple answer items for the question it will be marked inexact and will thus will not help the question's score.
In addition to judging the individual instances in a response, the assessors will also group correct instances into equivalence classes, where each equivalence class is considered a distinct answer item. Scores will be computed using the number of distinct answer items returned in the set.Rigid-list-score
The final answer set for a rigid list question will be created from the union of the distinct answer items returned by all participants and answer items found by the NIST assessor during question development. An individual list question will be scored by first computing instance recall (IR) and instance precision (IP) using the final answer set, and combining those scores using the F measure with recall and precision equally weighted. That is:
IP = # distinct answer items returned/# instances returned
F = (2*IP*IR)/(IP+IR)
The response for a squishy list question is syntactically the same as for a rigid list question: an unordered, non-empty set of [answer-string, docid] pairs. The interpretation of this set is different, however. There is no expectation of an exact answer to squishy list questions, although responses will be penalized for excessive length.
For each squishy list question, the assessor will create a list of acceptable information nuggets from the union of the returned responses and the information discovered during question development. All decisions regarding acceptability are in the opinion of the assessor. Once the list of acceptable nuggets is created, the assessor will mark the nuggets contained in each [answer-string, docid] pair. Each nugget that is present will be counted only once.
Some of the acceptable nuggets will be deemed vital, while other nuggets on the list are merely okay. A score for each squishy list question will be computed using multiple assessors' judgments of whether a nugget is vital or okay. Each nugget will be assigned a weight equal to the number of assessors who judged it to be vital; nugget weights will then be normalized so that the maximum weight of nuggets for each squishy list question is 1.0 . See (Lin and Demner-Fushman, HLT/NAACL 2006) for details.Squishy-list-score
An individual squishy list question will be scored using nugget recall (NR) and an approximation to nugget precision (NP) based on length. These scores will be combined using the F measure with beta=3 (recall weighted more heavily than precision). In particular:
length = total # non-white-space characters in answer strings
NP = 1 if length < allowance
NP = 1 - [(length - allowance) / length] if length >= allowance
F = (beta * beta + 1) * NP * NR / (beta * beta * NP + NR)
The different types of questions (rigid list and squishy list) have different scoring metrics, but each of the two scores has a range of [0.0, 1.0] with 1.0 being the high score. NIST will compute the rigid-list-score and squishy-list-score for each series. The rigid-list-score for a series is the mean of the F scores of the rigid list questions in the series. The squishy-list-score for a series is the mean of the F scores of the squishy list questions in the series. The per-series combined score will be a simple average of these two scores for questions in the series:
NIST assessors assess the answer-strings with respect to the viewable text of the supporting document as viewed from a web browser. This means that text in the document that is not displayed when the document is viewed in the browser is not considered by the assessor. That includes META tags, comments, and other text that is only visible by viewing the HTML source.
The NIST assessment platform displays the blog documents to the assessors using a web browser. It tries to show the document as closely as possible to how it would be seen during normal browsing, with two caveats. The first caveat is that SCRIPT sections are removed, so that the pages don't interact adversely with the assessment platform itself. The second caveat is that images and stylesheets are loaded from the web, rather than from a local cache, so if that data has changed then the page appearance can be different. For blogs this last is less of a problem than for the general Web, based on past NIST experience.
The NIST assessment platform (as well as the PRISE retrieval system) is written in Java and uses an open-source HTML and XML parsing tool called NekoHTML, written by Andy Clark. NIST uses NekoHTML when parsing documents for indexing, and also to remove SCRIPT elements before sending documents to the browser.
NIST is an agency of the
U.S. Department of Commerce
Last updated: Tuesday, 28-Mar-2017 11:20:33 EDT
Comments to: email@example.com