TAC 2016 Tracks Cold Start SF/KB EDL Ensembling Event Event Nugget Event Argument Belief/Sentiment Data Schedule Organizers Track Registration Reporting Guidelines TAC 2016 Workshop |
TAC KBP 2016 Event TrackOverviewThe goal of the TAC KBP Event track is to extract information about events such that the information would be suitable as input to a knowledge base. In 2016, there will be document-level evaluations of Event Nugget Detection and Coreference (EN) tasks and Event Argument Extraction and Linking (EAL) tasks. All Event tasks will be in three languages: English, Chinese, and Spanish. As in 2015, all Event tasks will operate using the Rich ERE definitions of events, nuggets, event hopper coreference, and argument validity. As in 2014/2015, the argument task will continue to support some inference of arguments that were ignored through "trumping" in Rich ERE. The evaluations will use a reduced event taxonomy. The document level tasks will all be scored via alignment with an LDC gold standard conforming to RichERE guidelines. For EN, this is the same scoring paradigm as in 2015. For EAL, this is a change. BBN will release software that calculates EAL scores (which will remain at "entity" not "mention" level) over RichERE. There will not be task specific training data created in 2016. Instead, participants will be encouraged to use a mix of (a) training data from previous years (Rich ERE, EN annotation, EA assessments, ACE) and (b) some additional RichERE that will be released for each of the three languages. Participants can submit to any number and combination of tasks in the Event track. Because input documents are shared across the tasks, participants must refrain from examining any of the input documents before they have finished submitting results for all of the Event tasks in which they are participating. Preliminary Schedule
References
While the ACE 2005 event annotation is being provided to all participants, this task diverges from ACE in some cases. One example of divergence is the addition of correct answers derived through inference/world knowledge. This evaluation will treat as correct some cases that were explicitly excluded in ACE 2005. Track CoordinatorsEvent Arguments: Marjorie Freedman (BBN, mfreedma@bbn.com)Event Nuggets: Teruko Mitamura (CMU, teruko@cs.cmu.edu) and Eduard Hovy (CMU, ehovy@andrew.cmu.edu) |
NIST is an agency of the
U.S. Department of Commerce
privacy policy / security notice / accessibility statement
disclaimer
FOIA
Last updated: Tuesday, 28-Mar-2017 15:22:19 UTC
Comments to: tac-web@nist.gov